图片名称

[EMC Standard] In-depth Analysis of IEC 61000-4-2:2025

Author.

LCS

Source:

Post time:

2026-03-03

This article focuses on the IEC 61000-4-2:2025 standard, and will provide an in-depth analysis of its main differences from previous versions, as well as the purposes behind these changes;

 

Standard version number change:

 

 

Calibration requirements for the discharge generator in the 2025 version

 

- Increase the number of current waveform measurement points by Ip2 (maximum peak value between 10ns and 40ns)

 

 

-Calibration of electrostatic gun

 

The arrangement for electrostatic gun calibration has been added to the main text of Section 6.3.

 

2. A 1.2*1.5m grounding reference panel has been added below the electrostatic gun, and the height requirement (1m) between the current target and the grounding reference plane has also been increased.

 

Output voltage range of electrostatic gun

 

1. The output voltage range of the high-voltage power supply spans a wide range, with a minimum output voltage of less than 100V and a maximum output voltage of greater than 30KV.

2. Voltage accuracy of ±5% for both high and low voltages.

3. It increases the cost of the high-voltage power supply. For users, it also increases the equipment investment cost.

 

Test setup

 

1. It is explicitly required that any external power supply for the electrostatic discharge generator should be placed on the RGP.

2. The distance between the discharge return cable and other conductive components in the test configuration must not be less than 0.1 meters (changed from 0.2 meters).

3. The connection with RGP and all lapping should have low impedance (newly added, e.g. ≤0.1 ohm), which can be achieved by using mechanical clamping devices.

4. Increase the error range of the bleeder resistor to (470±10) KΩ, and specify the position of the resistor (no more than 10 cm from either end of the cable).

Note 2: Unless otherwise decided by the product committee, electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing is generally not conducted for equipment installed on the ceiling, as users will not come into contact with such equipment after installation.

 

Desktop test setup

 

New addition 1: The maximum length of the discharge resistor cable should be 1.5 meters.

New addition 2: The device under test and its cables should be separated from the HCP using an insulating material with a thickness of (0.5 ± 0.05) mm.

Addition 3: The VCP is a square with a side length of (0.5 ± 0.005) m, placed on a non-conductive support; and it maintains a distance of (0.1 ± 0.01) m from the side of the equipment under test (EUT). The maximum length of the VCP discharge resistor cable assembly should be 3 meters, and it must not be bundled.

 

Appendix A (Informative) Explanatory Notes

 

Appendix H (Normative) Upgrade Strategy [New] Primarily addresses discrepancies in test results and adds operational instructions.

 

Due to the inherent complexity of the electrostatic discharge (ESD) phenomenon and the unavoidable inherent biases in testing equipment, the performance of the equipment under test (EUT) often exhibits various variations when subjected to discharge testing. These variations typically stem from incorrect test level differences or different types of errors exhibited by the EUT during the testing process. Depending on the test level stages where these performance variations occur, the results may significantly impact the determination of whether the EUT passes or fails the test.

 

If the equipment under test (EUT) exhibits differences in performance, the following steps can be followed to accurately identify the root cause of these differences:

a) Comprehensive verification of test setup: Conduct a detailed inspection of all test details, including the specific location of each cable and the status of the tested equipment itself, such as whether the lid is closed and the door is open or closed.

 

b) Strictly verify the testing procedure: This includes clarifying the operating mode of the equipment under test (EUT), confirming the placement and layout of auxiliary equipment, assessing whether the operator's position meets the specifications, checking whether the software is operating normally, and reviewing whether the entire process of applying discharge operations to the EUT is compliant.

 

c) Rigorous verification to determine whether the differences in test results are caused by the use of different generators: For safety-related functions, the product committee can decide whether to adopt an upgrade strategy based on the actual situation, or choose to implement a more stringent upgrade strategy.

 

Upgrade strategy: When all test conditions, including the electrostatic discharge generator, remain consistent, if there are differences in the performance of the equipment under test (EUT), the following upgrade strategy should be applied to determine whether the EUT meets the requirements. This strategy is applicable to each test point where the EUT performance exceeds the specified requirements when a set of discharges is applied.

 

The initial test has been conducted in an orderly manner according to the established test level as per clause 8.3.2. If the performance of the equipment under test (EUT) exceeds the specified requirements more than once during the test, then the test result exceeds the acceptable performance threshold preset by the product committee. If the EUT performance exceeds the specified requirements only once in the initial discharge test set, further testing should be conducted according to step 2) below.

 

The second test shall be conducted at this test point, with the number of discharges increased to twice the specified test requirements. If, during this test, the performance of the equipment under test (EUT) exceeds the specified requirements more than once, the test result exceeds the acceptable performance threshold set by the product committee. If, during the initial discharge process, the performance of the EUT exceeds the specified requirements only once, further testing shall be conducted according to step 3) below.

 

The third test shall be conducted at this test point, with the same number of discharges as in step 2), strictly adhering to the specified test level. If the performance of the EUT (Equipment Under Test) does not exceed the specified performance requirements, then the test result falls within the acceptable performance threshold range set by the product committee. If the performance of the EUT exceeds the specified performance requirements, then the test result is outside the acceptable performance threshold range set by the product committee.

 

Appendix J (Informative) Wearable Devices [New]

 

For the additional electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing of wearable devices, the recommended storage capacitance and discharge resistance are 200pF and 50Ω, respectively. The electrostatic discharge is applied to the conductive parts of the wearable device in contact discharge mode, aiming to reproduce the most severe discharge current conditions that can be generated by a wearable device worn at the waist

 

Appendix K (Informative) Evaluation of Test Results [New]

 

A) "Normal" operation

The condition typically considered as "normal" operation refers to the product functioning in accordance with the specifications and tolerances outlined in the product documentation. Electrostatic discharge (ESD) often leads to performance degradation, thereby affecting the normal operation of the EUT. Hence, when evaluating test results, the product committee may opt for performance criterion B.

 

B) Acceptable performance degradation

During electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing, a certain degree of performance degradation (i.e., exceeding specifications) is permissible, provided that the device can recover to its normal operating state upon completion of the test. Such situations are generally acceptable. When determining the acceptable threshold for performance degradation, the product committee should fully consider the reasonable expectations of users during normal use of the device. For instance, during electrostatic discharge testing, if the device becomes unusable or loses all functionality, this is generally unacceptable. Here are some specific examples:

 

Display screen: Display screens are generally encapsulated with non-conductive materials, so they require air discharge testing. Electrostatic discharge air discharge testing may cause a significant decrease in display brightness or jitter. At this time, a threshold can be set to judge, which allows the display brightness to decrease to a certain extent, while the jitter is within an acceptable range, and important information displayed can still be clearly recognized. For example, if a "black screen" occurs, it may exceed the acceptable threshold.

Digital circuits: Electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing may cause interruptions in synchronous circuits. To address this, a threshold can be set: after an ESD event occurs, when "normal" data transmission can be restored, the error rate of affected data transmission should be within a certain range. For example, the error rate can be specified as not exceeding a specific value. If it exceeds this value, it indicates that it is beyond the acceptable range.

 

C) Operation interruption and equipment recovery

This situation is generally recognized as follows: during an operation interruption, the equipment will not be damaged, and operators are allowed to intervene when necessary to restore operation. However, this performance standard is generally not applicable to evaluating ESD test results.

Media Center

Latest News

Contact Us

图片名称
图片名称

National 24-hour service hotline

400-116-2629

Group Headquarters

Cell phone:18126505465

E-mail: webmaster@lcs-cert.com

Address: Shenzhen City, Baoan District, Shajing Street, Nga side of the school of Wei Juji Industrial Park, Building A 1 ~ 2 floor, Building C 3 floor